If folks emember I have done a little in public spaces to question Norman on his 9/11 views on KPFA’s sunday show a year or so ago, and in a Santa Rosa event when I asked him about his resignation from Proect censored’d board in response to a Steven Jones appearancr. The question I have is how do we pose a question that he cannot just respond with usual non-sensical rant which includes his vehment denials of anything significant in the present evidence but he will also mutter his support for a new investigation. I would prefer if he were to shut up with his lip service that he has no conviction for. Matt
If folks emember I have done a little in public spaces to question Norman on his 9/11 views on KPFA’s sunday show a year or so ago, and in a Santa Rosa event when I asked him about his resignation from Proect censored’d board in response to a Steven Jones appearancr. The question I have is how do we pose a question that he cannot just respond with usual non-sensical rant which includes his vehment denials of anything significant in the present evidence but he will also mutter his support for a new investigation. I would prefer if he were to shut up with his lip service that he has no conviction for. Matt